Our Lord Jesus Christ says, "If you abide in my word, you are my disciples indeed. You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free" (John 8:31-32).
I promised to post a message here as soon as I heard anything, so here it is:
Larry left a message on my cell this morning - Mabel was born at 5:56 a.m., 7 lbs. 4 oz., 20 in., both baby and mommy doing well (daddy sounded okay, too).
Heavenly Father, receive our heartfelt thanks for this child, a gift of Your grace and love for us in Your beloved Son, Jesus Christ. Send Your holy angels to shield her from all dangers of body and soul. Preserve her according to Your good pleasure until that day when she is brought to the waters of Holy Baptism to receive the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit; through Jesus Christ, our Lord, who lives and reigns with You and the same Holy Spirit, one God, now and forever. Amen.
CONGRATS Larry and Annie (and Ben)!
Update - Larry just sent me this first pic of Mabel:
A brother, Pr. Matthew Uttenreither, posted links to the following videos on another forum with the introductory note, Here are two youtube videos that shows the divide that exists [within the LCMS]. I've posted the video from LakePointe on this blog before, but the contrast really becomes clear when posted next to the video from Grace Lutheran in Tulsa. Notice the stark differences at work here. Listen to the pastors. Where is their focus? What is the congregation they serve all about? Listen to those interviewed as well. Where is their focus? What is the congregation they attend all about? And then, after watching these, ask yourself: How can these two congregations exists side by side in the same synod? And then, after asking yourself that question, ask yourself this one: Why is it that the congregation that doesn't identify itself as Lutheran in its name (let alone in its doctrine and practice) is the one that has been put before our synod by President Kieschnick and others as "a perfect example" to follow?
On his blog this morning, Pr. Weedon posted the following:
The notion that everything in the Divine Service should be utterly clear, transparent, and understandable to the unbelieving and uncatechized person who happens upon it, is absolutely and totally destructive of the faith itself. Illumination comes THROUGH the Spirit's use of the Word; not TO it. What part of "and the darkness did not comprehend it" is incomprehensible to these liturgical innovators???
Exactly! The impetus to pitch the hymnals and remove all "obstacles" (you know, "obstacles" like vestments, candles, pulpits, altars, hymns, Creeds, sermons, Law and Gospel, sin and grace, reverence, etc.) in order to make "church" more appealing to unbelievers comes straight from the pit of hell. The old evil foe delights greatly when people set out to make church a place for people who don't like church. Nothing pleases him more than to see Christians consulting unbelievers to see what they want and desire in a church, collecting the data, and then designing their "worship experience" around it. Were Wormwood to write and inform Uncle Screwtape that he had convinced his "patient" to let unbelievers set the agenda for what is done in the "patient's" church, I dare say Uncle Screwtape would be most heartily pleased with Wormwood's efforts.
I've said it before and I'll say it again (and again and again) - the Divine Service is FOR THE CHURCHED (believers), not FOR THE UNCHURCHED (unbelievers). It consists of a language that must be learned, for that language is a heavenly language recognized only by those with Spirit-wrought faith. The Divine Service is the gathering of the faithful children of God around His Holy Word and Sacraments to receive the Divine Gifts He graciously and lovingly desires to distribute to them. In response, the faithful pray, praise, and give thanks to God, speaking back to Him the Words He has given them to speak. One must be catechized to understand what is truly going on the Divine Service. If an unbeliever walks in off the street, what is happening in the Divine Service will be foreign to him. If it's not; if it's all too familiar, then something is woefully wrong.
None of this means that we don't do our very best to make visitors feel welcome or take measures to help them at least try to follow along during the Service (a detailed bulletin with page numbers goes a long way toward that). We should also make sure to identify visitors and greet them after the Service, etc. But, to design the Service around them - to change the language and remove all perceived "obstacles" so that they feel right at home - is destructive of the faith itself, as Pr. Weedon notes, but it also fails to benefit the visiting unchurched, unbelieving person as well, for it passes the faith off as something it is not and deceives them into believing that the church is no different from the world, and so on.
Besides all this, there is the whole Lutheran thing at play here. Lutherans do not "do church" like others. They can't, since their confession of the faith and theology of worship, which flows out of that confession, differs from the confession of the faith others make (or, go out of their way not to make). Thus, it should go without saying, but sadly needs to be said these days, that the following slogan should never, ever - no, not EVER! - be uttered by a Lutheran:
Actually, I should include Annie . . . so, just for Meggers and Annie, both of whom are waiting for the next time I will be absent on a Sunday so that they can get their "liturgical dance" on. Or, is it "praise dance" these days? Whatever. I just thought this would be a helpful resource for them as they conspire plan their performance praise offering via the medium of dance. They'll have to figure out how to turn this solo into a duet on their own - this is all the help I am willing to provide. :)
I mentioned to a friend earlier that I was looking forward to watching the Red Wings playoff game this afternoon (which I'm doing now), and she said, "I've never been into hockey. I just don't understand the game." Well, here ya go - all the explanation you need is contained in this clip from "Slapshot":
(If 80s rock ballads aren't your thing, you can simply ignore this)
The problem with choosing the greatest 80s rock ballad is that there were so many great ones from which to choose. For that reason, it is perfectly acceptable to put together a plethora of top ten lists which differ vastly in content. What is NOT acceptable, however, is to leave Tesla's "Love Song" off of any top ten list, since, well, it is THE Greatest 80s Rock Ballad. If you don't want to put it on top, in its rightful position, fine, but you are not allowed to compile a top ten list without it. Nope. Unacceptable, indeed! :)
(Note: Even without the extended guitar intro, it's still the greatest!)
Our Lord Jesus is the Good Shepherd (John 10:11–16).He is not like the hireling, who cares nothing for the sheep and only for himself, who flees when he sees the wolf coming.Rather, Jesus is the Good Shepherd who seeks out His scattered sheep to deliver them (Ezek. 34:11–16).He gathers them and feeds them in rich pasture.He binds up the broken and strengthens the sick.He lays down His life for wandering and wayward sheep.On the cross, Christ bore in His body the attacks of the predators of sin and death and the devil for you that you might be saved.He now lives to restore your soul in the still waters of baptism, to lead you in the paths of righteousness by the voice of His Gospel, to prepare the table of His holy supper before you, that you may dwell in the house of the Lord forever (Psalm 23). “For you were straying like sheep, but have now returned to the Shepherd and Overseer of your souls” (1 Peter 2:25).
Collect of the Day
O God, through the humiliation of Your Son You raised up the fallen world. Grant to Your faithful people, rescued from the peril of everlasting death, perpetual gladness and eternal joys; through Jesus Christ, our Lord, who lives and reigns with You and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and forever.
Hymn of the Day: LSB 709 "The King of Love My Shepherd Is"
I received an email yesterday from a reader who is concerned about the fact that her congregation is sending their youth to the LCMS National Youth Gathering which will take place in New Orleans this July. She was worried about the impact this would have on the youth. She explained that the congregation to which she belongs is a traditional/liturgical congregation and she is afraid of having the youth exposed to the kind of contemporary worship which will be on display at the Gathering. She also informed me that her pastor was just as concerned as she was, but that he, being only in his first year of service there, didn't want to cause waves by suggesting that the congregation break their tradition of sending their youth to the Gathering. I know exactly how he feels and don't blame him a bit. I also know how this woman feels. She is right to be concerned.
That's so sad, isn't it? That we have to worry about sending our youth to our own synod's National Youth Gathering, I mean. It's not only sad; it's a downright shame.
Why the worry? some might ask. Well, because for the last couple of decades, those who plan our Gatherings have gone out of their way to mimic the youth conferences held by Americanized "evangelicals." I know. I've been to those conferences. I'm not proud of it, but back in the nineties, I led the youth of the LCMS congregation I belonged to at the time to two "Acquire the Fire" conferences. Anyone who wants to argue that our synod's Gatherings have not become increasingly more like those conferences is gravely mistaken. They have. And, that's the danger and reason for worry. Those conferences are put on by those whose theology is vastly different from our Lutheran theology. The whole point of those conferences is to play on the kids' emotions in the hope that they will be so moved through the power of the "worship" and "testimonials" and "dramas," and so forth, that they will make a decision to accept Jesus as their Savior (or, for those who have already "made the decision," to "rededicate their lives" to Him). And, as someone who has experienced this live and in person, I'd be lying if I didn't admit that these conferences had a profound impact on my emotions. Heck, by the end of the first "Acquire the Fire" conference I attended, I was ready to rush the stage and "give my life to Jesus."
But, it's all superficial and shallow. It doesn't last. It didn't have a profound impact on any of our youth. How could it? It's just a show. It's rock-n-roll, dude. You "get down with Jesus" for a couple of days, are moved by the beat of the music and the heart-rending testimonials, and pumped up by the speakers who egg you on to "really let it all out and worship the Lord"! But then, all of a sudden, it's over. And so is the emotion. That feeling you experience - that so-called "spiritual high" you think you had - dissipates as fast as the drummer had smacked his drums during your favorite "praise song." Think of going to see your favorite rock band (or whatever other musical genre suits your fancy) in concert - that "high" you experience (and, no, I'm not talking about that kind of "high") lasts about until you get to your car in the parking lot (okay, if it was a really good concert, maybe till you get home). Then, it's gone - it quickly fizzles away. Emotions and feelings are fickle that way, you know.
For the life of me, I cannot fathom why it is that those who plan our synod's Gatherings do not understand this. They have an awesome opportunity to impact our youth with the Gospel, but instead seek ways to play on their emotions, just as the "evangelicals" do. They have a chance to present substance, but are content with providing a superficial experience. What's worse, they do not see the dangers of subjecting our youth to the false doctrines so prevalent in many of the rock-n-roll ditties performed by the bands they acquire to entertain lead the kids in "worship." It is as if they are ashamed of being Lutheran and want to give the youth something more exciting and adventurous.
Hopefully, the youth from this woman's congregation won't be as impacted by this as she fears. Hopefully, they'll just chalk it up to the "fun-fest" it is, and nothing more. Hopefully, once that "spiritual high" wears off, they'll just forget about the "experience" and return unfazed to the true Lutheran theology of worship followed in their home parish. But, again, it's so sad that we have to hope that our own synod's National Youth Gathering doesn't have an impact on our youth.
Thank God we have an alternative available in our synod today in Higher Things. Both the woman who emailed me and her pastor are hopeful that they'll be able to send their youth there in the years to come. I told her that she would be very pleased if that panned out. Having been to three Higher Things conferences myself, I cannot recommend them highly enough. The good folks at Higher Things are not ashamed of being Lutheran and do not, in any way, shape, or form, attempt to cloak their Lutheranism in some other guise. In fact, their motto for the youth is, "Dare to be Lutheran!" Imagine that! A Lutheran youth conference for Lutheran youth that actually practices Lutheranism. A novel concept, that.
Anyway, if you are still wondering why all the fuss, here are a couple of videos to watch. The first one is a clip from the 2007 LCMS National Youth Gathering, where the youth are being led to sing, "Open the Eyes of My Heart, Lord," which is a popular "praise song" that has no business being sung by Lutherans (I apologize to all of you who like this song, but, well, it's the truth - the theology carried along by the lyrics is just simply awful, and most definitely not in line with Lutheranism). The second video is the promo for this year's "Acquire the Fire" Conferences, just to give you an idea of where those who plan our synod's Gatherings get their ideas (I know several LCMS pastors and leaders who have attended these just for that purpose - oh, and by the way, "Open the Eyes of My Heart, Lord" has been sung at many "Acquire the Fire" conferences - just sayin'). Notice the crass decision theology which comes through loud and clear in this video. Do we really want to mimic this? Really?
It is fascinating to listen to those who oppose the plan put forth by LCMS Presidential Nominee Rev. Matthew Harrison in his essay, "It's Time." They want to set parameters in place that would ensure that no one engaging in the sort of "Formula of Concord-like" theological dialogue Rev. Harrison proposes would be made to feel any less Lutheran than anyone else. In other words, they want the dialogue to begin around the assumption that everyone gathering together to talk is Lutheran in doctrine and practice.
But, that kind of defeats the point, doesn't it? I mean, if that assumption was true, there would be no reason to talk. Duh! Besides, it is that assumption which has ruled the day in the various theological convocations held during the current LCMS President's time in office, and it hasn't gotten us one iota closer to working out the differences and divisions which infect our synod. There can be no true dialogue if the assumption which undergirds such is that everyone engaging in the dialogue is equally Lutheran in doctrine and practice. That is not theological dialogue; that is post-modernism.
No, the sort of theological dialogue we desperately need in our synod must be honest and direct. No assumptions; no prerequisite to "agree to disagree"; no parameters set to deter anyone from speaking openly and honestly as they defend their position(s) on the basis of Holy Scripture and our Lutheran Confessions.
The fear some have regarding this sort of honest and direct theological dialogue is almost certainly due to the fact that it has been so long since we have done things this way that they have no idea what it even means anymore. We have grown so accustomed to being agreeably disagreeable and have for so long forsaken any semblance of the kind of church discipline that would result from properly exercised ecclesiastical oversight of doctrine and practice that we are like "fish out of water" when it comes to honest and direct theological dialogue. I mean, God forbid that we declare anything done within our synod out of bounds. The best we can do is to "evangelically encourage" our brothers and sisters who have abandoned our confession of the faith to think about what they're doing and how what they're doing affects the rest of us. But, to call them to repentance and demand that they cease and desist if they want to remain in our fellowship, well that's just mean and out of bounds in today's LCMS. That's too much like "browbeating" or "enforcement" or "coercion," and that would be just plain awful in the sight of many.
And, that's exactly our problem today. We have been taught to think that it's unnecessarily mean to point out error and to demand faithfulness to our Confessions. It's even considered by many to be a violation of the 8th Commandment to ever call into question the faithfulness of anyone's publicly revealed doctrine and practice. It doesn't matter how wacky that publicly revealed doctrine and practice is, either. If you say, "That is NOT Lutheran," you will be met with the hostility of many and be labeled a trouble-maker.
How far we have fallen from our Lutheran forebears! When controverted and divisive issues arose among them, they were not afraid to put those issues on the table, analyze them against Scripture and our Confessions, and come to a conclusion about them. And, having come to their conclusions, they were not afraid to demand that anyone wishing to call themselves Lutheran must comply. They believed that purity of doctrine and practice was non-negotiable, and that errors against the same could not be permitted. Call it "browbeating," "enforcement," or "coercion" if you will, but they believed that to be a Lutheran one must believe, teach, and confess what Lutherans believe, teach, and confess. I know, shocking, isn't it?
So it is that I'm not the least bit sympathetic toward those who fear the sort of honest and direct theological dialogue proposed by Rev. Harrison. It's the Lutheran way. Put the controverted and divisive issues on the table and discuss them on the basis of Holy Scripture and our Lutheran Confessions. Let each side make their arguments as passionately as they please. Let them mince no words and actually accuse the other side of being wrong, according to their interpretation of Scripture and Confessions. If each side is convinced of its position, it should not fear entering the dialogue, but rather should embrace the opportunity to defend its position and argue for its acceptance by the other side.
This doesn't mean that things have to be nasty at all. "Speaking the truth in love" should most definitely be the order of the day. But, "speaking the truth in love" has never meant "compromising the truth out of love," as many imagine it to mean. "Speaking the truth in love" presupposes that there is a truth to be spoken, which also means that anything in contradiction to that truth is falsehood. That's what we need to wrap our minds around if we will ever enter into the sort of honest and direct theological discourse we so desperately need. On the controverted and divisive issues among us, there is truth and there is falsehood. Let us engage one another honestly and directly to determine the truth, based on Scripture and our Confessions, with a willingness to repent if it be shown that we ourselves are in error.
How can any true Lutheran fear this process? The only reason I can muster as to why some would fear it is that they're nervous about having their doctrine and practice scrutinized, and the only reason they would be nervous about that is because they're not as sure as they'd like to be about whether or not their doctrine and practice jives with what Lutherans believe, teach, and confess. They're perfectly content with everyone doing whatever is pleasing in their own eyes and allowing the divisions within our synod to remain. Some of them even laud this as "blessed diversity," which is in gross contradiction to the Lutheran forebears from whom they claim to descend; those who would declare honestly and directly:
It is not only necessary that the pure, wholesome doctrine be rightly presented for the preservation of pure doctrine and for thorough, permanent, godly unity in the Church, but it is also necessary that the opponents who teach otherwise be reproved (1 Timothy 3; [2 Timothy 3:16;] Titus 1:9). Faithful shepherds, as Luther says, should do both things: (a) feed or nourish the lambs and (b) resist the wolves. Then the sheep may flee from strange voices (John 10:5-12) and may separate the precious from the worthless (Jeremiah 5:19). (Formula of Concord, Solid Declaration, Summary, Rule, and Norm, 14).
Having forgone my usual Sunday afternoon nap to watch the Masters, I fell asleep around 8 p.m. last night and awoke shortly after 3 a.m. this morning. I used the serenity of our sleepy house to do a little writing and to listen to some of the excellent "Issues, Etc." Holy Week segments I wasn't able to listen to during that busy week. Below is an awesome segment on "Classical Christian Worship" with guest, Pr. Scot Kinnaman, which I highly recommend to all. This, friends, is a wonderful explanation and exploration of the theology of worship believed, taught, and confessed by true Lutherans. Enjoy!
This year's Masters was one of the best in recent memory. So many story lines to follow. Tiger got most of the press coverage, as usual, returning to golf after his five month layoff due to his sex scandal. Say what you will about the dude, the bottom line is that he can flat out play the game. I can't think of another professional golfer who could be away from the game for nearly half a year and be in contention (he finished tied for fourth at -11) immediately upon his return, and that at a major championship. If we could just get the guy to quit taking the Lord's Name in vain after hitting a bad shot, it would be far more enjoyable to watch him display the gifts given him by the Lord in whom he doesn't believe. I sent him a message suggesting that instead of yelling out, "G-D" or "J-C," he think about yelling, "Oh, Buddha!" I haven't heard back from him as of yet; I'll keep you posted if I do.
Then there was Freddy (Couples, that is, for those of you who erroneously believe golf is a game not worth following). Man, I was rooting for him the whole way. The "old" guy (he's 50) still has plenty of game, and is still as fun to watch as he was in his prime. He had a legitimate shot at winning this thing this year, but, alas, it wasn't meant to be. Still, Freddy's quiet demeanor and laid back approach to the game is a privilege to witness. He encapsulates the best of what this great game is all about. A true class act on and off the course; a true ambassador for the game if ever there was one. Freddy ended up finishing in 6th place at -9.
And what about the final round charge of A.K. (that's Anthony Kim)! Wow! Talk about a young player who is fun to watch, especially when he gets hot like today. Last year, Kim set a Masters record with eleven birdies in one round; this year he went low on the final day, heating up on the back nine to turn in an impressive 7-under for the round and posting the score to beat early at -12. It turned out to be too little, too late, but you gotta give the kid props for making the surge he did. At 25-years-old, Kim will be around for a while and will surely have many more opportunities to don the coveted green jacket.
We could also talk about the guys from across the pond who made this year's Masters exciting - Lee Westwood and Ian Poulter. While Poulter fell out of contention on Saturday, Westwood, who has been so close to winning a major the last four starts, battled till the end. He ended up coming in at a distant second, three shots back, when it was all said and done, but he was right in there putting pressure on the leader, Phil Mickelson, on the 17th green, sinking a birdie putt which forced Mickelson to convert a lengthy par putt to maintain a two-stroke lead heading to the 18th tee. If Lefty misses that putt, it's anyone's game.
But, for all the other story lines that made this year's Masters one for the ages, the best of all was the story of Lefty, who prevailed to earn his third green jacket at Augusta. The backdrop to his story makes his victory all the more sweet. His wife, Amy, has been struggling with breast cancer for over a year now, and it has been a very difficult battle that is long from over. Add to that the fact that Mickelson's mother, Mary, was also diagnosed with cancer a while back. Lefty and his family have been through so much this past year. He has taken a lot of time off from the game to be with his wife and mother these past several months and, coming into the Masters, his game was pretty much in shambles. No one, including myself, gave him much of a chance to contend, let alone win. I mean, it was a possibility, to be sure, but the odds were not good. But, he proved us all wrong and put together a week at the Masters that will surely be talked about for generations to come.
His approach shot at the par-5 13th was one of the most remarkable golf shots ever. In the pine straw, with a couple of trees in front of him, the smart play was to punch the ball out and lay up. But, that's just not how Lefty plays the game. Never has been, and probably never will be. Lefty has always gone for it, and often has paid the price for doing so. But, when he goes for it and converts, as he did today, it is pure joy to witness. He knocked that ball from the pine straw, through the trees, barely carrying the creek guarding the green, to within ten feet for an eagle opportunity. As he was swinging, I was thinking, "Oh no, Lefty, don't do it!" But, he did it, and the result was nothing short of amazing. He ended up missing the eagle putt, which probably would have put things away at that point, but converted the birdie and kept the momentum going, which would lead him to his third Masters Championship.
What a truly "feel-good" story! I couldn't be happier for Lefty and family. Lefty is a class act, on and off the course, and always has been. He is not one who basks in the spotlight, but has always come off humble and appreciative of the gifts he's been given. I've always been a fan, but even more so now. Walking off the 18th green, after sinking a birdie putt he didn't need to win, he immediately headed to Amy and embraced her, with tears running down his cheeks (it was at that time that I think I got something stuck in my eyes as they began to water for some reason, too). An emotional victory. A tremendous victory. A victory for the ages. Congratulations, Lefty! Well deserved and well earned!
And some people think that golf is boring . . . sheesh! :)
"Quasimodo geniti infantes . . ." ("Like newborn infants . . . , Alleluia, long for the pure spiritual milk [of the Word.] Alleluia."
Today is historically known as "Quasimodo Geniti" Sunday in the Church. It has also become known as "Low Sunday," since, well, the attendance on this Second Sunday of Easter is almost always quite lower than it was on Easter Sunday. This certainly held true in our parish today, although rather than it being a "Low Sunday," it was more like a "Normal Sunday." I'd bet that is probably the case in many parishes, namely that "Low Sunday" is really better described as "Back-to-Normal Sunday." I propose that we just go ahead and re-name this day, "Back-to-Normal Sunday."
Still, it is always a bit of a let-down to see the pews back to their normal half-packed status after seeing them packed the week before, but such is life in the church today. And, the Holy Gospel for the day could not be more appropriate, for it is the account of Jesus' appearance to the disciples in the locked room, first on the evening of the day of Resurrection and again on the eighth day (the next Sunday). Thomas is not with the disciples on Easter evening, and thus misses out on the blessing Jesus bestows upon them. That's what happens when we skip Church, folks. We miss out on Jesus and the blessings He desires to bestow upon us through the Divine Gifts He delivers via His Holy Word and Sacraments. Thomas, missing out, finds it hard to believe. His faith, not having been strengthened by being in Jesus' Presence, is weak. In fact, he says that he will never believe unless he sees and touches Jesus for himself.
Thankfully, our Lord is gracious and merciful, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love. He shows up again on the next Lord's Day for Divine Service with His disciples. This time, Thomas is there and receives the blessings of the Lord's Gifts and is strengthened and preserved in the faith to confess: "My Lord and My God!"
The same Crucified and Risen Lord continues to show up each and every Lord's Day in the midst of His disciples to forgive them, renew them, feed them, strengthen and preserve them, and bless them with His peace. In fact, what we see in the Holy Gospel for this day, besides the importance of being in the Divine Service, is the way in which our Lord would fulfill His promise to be with us always, for here we witness our Lord calling and ordaining His chosen men to the apostolic Word and Sacrament Ministry, i.e., the Office of the Holy Ministry. He breathes on them and says, "Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of anyone, they are forgiven; if you withhold forgiveness from anyone, it is withheld." It is through these men, and all their successors, who serve in the stead and by the command of Christ, that the forgiveness won by Jesus is distributed to repentant sinners through the preaching of the pure Gospel and the administration of the Sacraments, according to Christ's institution.
So, get thee to Church, my friends. There, in His Holy House, our Lord Jesus is truly Present FOR YOU! Present with His very Body and Blood, not only for you to see and touch, but to eat and drink for the forgiveness of your sins. Don't miss out!
The Processional Hymn this morning:
LSB 490 "Jesus Lives! The Victory's Won" (st. 1)
Jesus lives! The vict'ry's won!
Death no longer can appall me;
Jesus lives! Death's reign is done!
From the grave will Christ recall me.
Brighter scenes will then commence;
This shall be my confidence.
Different title, but same tune here:
Collect of the Day: Almighty God, grant that we who have celebrated the Lord's resurrection may by Your grace confess in our life and conversation that Jesus is Lord and God; through the same Jesus Christ, Your Son, who lives and reigns with You and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and forever. Amen.
our new internet service! Wow, what a difference! Living "out in the sticks," our options for internet service are limited. During our first year and a half here, we had to suffer through using dial-up. Ugh! The fact that we had high-speed cable internet service previous to moving here made it all the more unbearable. But, then we were introduced to a DSL wireless provider that was offering service to our area, so we made the switch to that. It was a major improvement, to be sure, but it has been anything but high-speed these past three-plus years. Sometimes it seemed no faster than dial-up speeds; other times it seemed much faster; but, at no time, has it ever been high-speed. To watch a 3-minute Youtube video would take around 10 minutes, and forget about watching anything streaming. But, worse than the slowness of the supposed "high-speed" we were supposed to be getting was the frequent outages. For the past six months, it was common for the service to be down multiple times daily (ten minutes here, an hour or two there, and so on) - very frustrating. I spent countless hours on the phone with tech support, but to no avail. The low speeds and outages continued.
Finally, a couple of weeks ago I did some shopping around to see if there were any other providers in our area. Long story short, there was a provider that was broadcasting off of the tower that I can see from my back yard, and could give me "direct line of sight" service at high speed. They assured me that I would see a huge difference with their service. They were right. They came out yesterday and installed the service and it is like night and day from what I had. Simply awesome! I actually watched some of the Masters golf tournament streaming online yesterday without any pauses for buffering. I also watched an episode of The Office from nbc.com, which was simply impossible before. And, as for youtube videos - no waiting at all anymore! Imagine that - you click play and watch the video (instead of pausing it to give it ten minutes to load). Very cool! The best thing of all is that this new service is actually $5/month cheaper than what I have been paying (although I did have to break down and pay an install fee).
I'm loving our new service. It's good to be back in the 21st century again!
